| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Petition for old style fitting window - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: annab WHy not have both and give us a choice we can have new or old styles. This is what I'm asking for, an option to choose which one to use for non T3 ships. _________________ [IMAGE REMOVED] -- aka Cpt Bogus -- Is tha...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.03.15 11:32:00
|
2. Petition for old style fitting window - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Apologies if this is being discussed elsewhere (feel free to lock/merge if it is), but we all know search doesn't work too well and I didn't want to clog up the main Apocrypha feedback thread with a mess of /signed for one relatively non-critical ...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.03.13 06:39:00
|
3. Let's start some constructive critique for improving fitting screen. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Perhaps an easy solution would be to add both of them, and have a settings option to toggle which one the player wants. More customizability is always a good thing. _________________ [IMAGE REMOVED] -- aka Cpt Bogus -- Is that my torped sig cloa...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.02.12 10:32:00
|
4. Let's start some constructive critique for improving fitting screen. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Krxon Blade IMO, old fitting screen was more logical and practical than this new one. CCP should obey golden rule: "Don't fix what ain't broken!" Signed. Old one works fine--I'm going to be ****ed if they make me give u...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.02.12 10:04:00
|
5. Ejecting from your T3 ship so you do not lose SP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hopefully the stats will remain balanced enough that they wont do to HACs what HACs did to t1 cruisers, and itll be moot. Personally I'd love it if people ejected--maybe PvP loot would have some actual value then. _________________ [IMAGE REMOV...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.02.12 10:01:00
|
6. A simple guide to the new probing system for begginers! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Have you noticed any change in the number of ordinary sites you're finding? With it being much easier to figure out if there is actually a site somewhere in the system or not, methinks there wont be nearly enough sites for explorers if they dont m...
- by Del Narveux - at 2009.02.11 09:15:00
|
7. Sin balance. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Targeting range boost seems fair, the other stuff would run the risk of OPing it. More sigrez would be nice too, for the same reasons. _________________ [IMAGE REMOVED] -- aka Cpt Bogus -- Is that my torped sig cloaking your base?
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.27 06:06:00
|
8. Any changes for minmatar or has CCP given up on them. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon Rigs that have WAY worse bonus than the modules, stack nerfed along with modules and with HUGE drawback... equals TOTAL FAIL, total waste of development time of players time of database of everything! Rigs a...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.27 01:26:00
|
9. Zulupark's answers. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
For what its worth if the scrams jamming MWD does indeed make it to TQ, zu/lach will be the new rapier. Maybe thats the idea, zu is the anti nano, rapier is missile monsters best friend, falcon jams and pilgrim gobbles up cap and drone****s.
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.27 01:19:00
|
10. Zulupark's answers. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: How about Navy Issue capitals? Thanatos Navy Issue wouldnt be overpowered in any sense. It would simply have tons more buffer and thusly harder to kill. Meaning that's pretty good for cap fights. The ship would pretty much have the sa...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.26 12:10:00
|
11. Zulupark's answers. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My thoughts on some of your thoughts... Quote: If this is done... you increase risk in 0.0 and the rewards stay the same. Meaning less value. This is a two-edged sword, as it also means it takes much longer for roamers to clear a system...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.26 11:49:00
|
12. Singularity Webifiers and the Speed Nerf - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Using Tachyons (which could almost be classified as an "oversized" BS weapon) to shoot down a Centii Loyal Savage (Frigate) orbiting at 3.8km , should be next to impossible. In light of the fact that drones are ...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.26 11:13:00
|
13. Titans - Whats the game going to be like in 12m? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Titans, moms and carriers all need a major overhaul on the order of the nanonerf. They should not be the ships of the line that they have become, rather they should be support ships backing up a fleet of regular ships. As it stands now, once the c...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.25 09:59:00
|
14. T III ships and modules, when? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hopefully never, T3 is a really bad idea unless it comes with severe penalties to stats that matter, i.e. a full set of lasers gives -40% armor HP or somesuch.
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.25 09:49:00
|
15. Why are webs a required module for PVP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ive found that sub-BS guns track pretty well against anything but really hardcore nanos, even with low skills. Nanonerf should help with the extreme bits, but IMO if a BS wants to be able to **** cruisers it should have to give up a couple of slot...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.25 09:45:00
|
16. Local chat changes=game ending. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The hilarious irony of removing local is it may actually lead to more attacker tears than defender tears, once they start having to spend 10 minutes scanning every (95% of the time empty) system to see if theres stuff to shoot at, instead of a qui...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.25 06:37:00
|
17. Changed Base Speed of BS has (bad) influence on Mission runners - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I dont really see the point of making battleships slower, theyre pretty damn slow as it is without lots of speed mods. Anyway how does speed-tanking with AB work on lvl 4s? I'm wondering if that will be viable with the new and improved afterburne...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.19 13:07:00
|
18. Drone dmg vs small ships on sissi... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
All of that discussion is moot because the only three inties with enough slots to try something approaching a tank dont have enough med slots to perform their role as fast tackler. They will be good inty vs inty post nerf though. _________________...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.19 13:04:00
|
19. On to missile/drone "nerf" and missions - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree that if drones are getting nerfed vs frigs, need to pull the frigs out of lvl 4's. Bear in mind this is an even bigger problem for the people who don't fly Caldari since big battleship guns dont do jack against frigates that orbit <10...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.19 12:56:00
|
20. next fotm is...: - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I suspect itll be sniper gangs running AB and a mix of nano, OD and i-stab to stay out of range of anything that could get them. Also, Lachesis will be the new Rapier and TD will be the new ECM. _________________ [IMAGE REMOVED] -- aka Cpt Bogus -...
- by Del Narveux - at 2008.10.19 12:45:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |